“Was you ever bit by a dead bee?” – Evolutionary games and dominated strategies

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):175-176 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On top of the puzzles mentioned by Colman comes the puzzle of why rationality has bewitched classical game theory for so long. Not the smallest merit of evolutionary game theory is that it views rationality as a limiting case, at best. But some problems only become more pressing.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evolutionary games without rationality?Martin Bunzl - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (3):365-378.
Rational belief and social interaction.Daniel M. Hausman - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):163-164.
Rationality and indeterminacy.Cristina Bicchieri - 2009 - In Don Ross & Harold Kincaid (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 159.
Beyond rationality: Rigor without mortis in game theory.Andrew M. Colman - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):180-192.
Game theory without rationality.Anatol Rapoport - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (1):114.
Game theory without rationality.John Maynard Smith - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (1):117.
Locally rational decision-making.Richard M. Shiffrin - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):175-175.
Evolutionary game theory: Suddenly it's 1960!John C. Malone - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (1):112.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
25 (#878,439)

6 months
7 (#702,633)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karl Sigmund
University of Vienna

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references