Tastes, Smells, and Aesthetics

In Frank Sibley, John Benson, Betty Redfern & Jeremy Roxbee Cox, Approach to aesthetics: collected papers on philosophical aesthetics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 207–255 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Tackles the neglected question of whether tastes and smells can be objects of aesthetic interest, appreciation, satisfaction, and value. Bypassing the question of whether the objects of tasting and smelling are works of art, Sibley states that it is not the case that tastes and smells are wholly excluded from the realm of the aesthetic, that is to say, that they do not necessarily lack those features that would make them eligible in such a way that aesthetic judgements or descriptions of them are possible. Sibley offers a variety of considerations in favour of the view that tastes and smells meet some of the demands we typically impose on objects if viewed in the context of aesthetic evaluation. Since, furthermore, no suitable candidate presents itself to serve as a criterion of demarcating the aesthetic and the sensuous, and since, consequently, these domains have to be understood as merging along a continuum, the diverse intersections between the two permit of some aesthetic evaluation of the sensuous.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,101

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aquinas on the aesthetic relevance of tastes and smells.Donald McQueen - 1993 - British Journal of Aesthetics 33 (4):346-356.
Aquinas' reasons for the aesthetic irrelevance of tastes and smells.Neil Campbell - 1996 - British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (2):166-176.
Arts or the Aesthetic—Which Comes First?Frank Sibley - 2001 - In Frank Sibley, John Benson, Betty Redfern & Jeremy Roxbee Cox, Approach to aesthetics: collected papers on philosophical aesthetics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 135–141.
Aesthetic Judgements: Pebbles, Faces, and Fields of Litter.Frank Sibley - 2001 - In Frank Sibley, John Benson, Betty Redfern & Jeremy Roxbee Cox, Approach to aesthetics: collected papers on philosophical aesthetics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 176–189.
Reading Sibley.George Dickie - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):408-412.
Aesthetic Realism And Metaphor.Julian Jonker - 2009 - Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics 6 (2).
Irreversible generalism: A reply to Dickie.Oliver Conolly & Bashshar Haydar - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):289-295.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-20

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references