Pragmatism and Interpretation: Radical, Relativistic, but not Unruly

Contemporary Pragmatism 19 (2):91-112 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Interpretation has been a key theme in pragmatist aesthetics, but its centrality in neopragmatist thinking goes far beyond the field of art. Its influence extends into epistemology, ontology, and the philosophies of language, history, selfhood, and culture. Joseph Margolis devoted many articles and even an entire book to this topic, which he titled Interpretation Radical but Not Unruly. My critical examination of Margolis’s theory of interpretation shows how it is radical not only in terms of its robust relativism. It is also radical in the etymological sense of “radical” as “forming the root” of his philosophical thought in general. The logic of interpretation that Margolis developed for aesthetics is the original, generative source of his relativism, but its influence and relativist logic then extended ever more widely and deeply into his themes of anti-essentialism, historicism, and flux that pervade his metaphysics of culture and philosophical anthropology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-02

Downloads
22 (#1,015,764)

6 months
9 (#328,796)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Shusterman
Florida Atlantic University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references