'Head or heart?' Revisited: Physilogy and political thought in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries

History of Political Thought 28 (2):208-229 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Medical metaphors pervade medieval European political writings. No attempt has been made to establish the relationship between bodily imageries of the political community and anatomical and/or physiological knowledge. A survey of bodily metaphors shows that the primacy of the head of the body politic was challenged at the turn of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries by an alternative view: the pre-eminence of the heart. This coincided with the penetration of Aristotelian physiology into scholastic medicine, which triggered debates over the most important member of the body natural: is it the head or the heart? The medical inspiration for the conceptualization of the body politic illustrates the great impact of the 'Aristotelian revolution' in medieval political thought

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The microbial state: global thriving and the body politic.Stefanie R. Fishel - 2017 - Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
19 (#1,071,453)

6 months
5 (#1,035,390)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references