What, after all, was Heidegger about?

Continental Philosophy Review 47 (3-4):249-274 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The premise is that Heidegger remained a phenomenologist from beginning to end and that phenomenology is exclusively about meaning and its source. The essay presents Heidegger’s interpretation of the being (Sein) of things as their meaningful presence (Anwesen) and his tracing of such meaningful presence back to its source in the clearing, which is thrown-open or appropriated ex-sistence (das ereignete/geworfene Da-sein). The essay argues five theses: (1) Being is the meaningful presence of things to man. (2) Such meaningful presence is the Befragtes of Heidegger’s question, not the Erfragtes. (3) Being and Time’s goal was to articulate the openness that allows for all meaningfulness. (4) Ereignis—the appropriation of ex-sistence to sustaining the clearing—is the later Heidegger’s reinscription of thrown-openness, der geworfene Entwurf. (5) Appropriated thrown-openness, as the clearing, is intrinsically hidden, i.e., unknowable.Some preliminariesI cite Heidegger’s texts by page and line (the line-number follows the period) in both the Gesamtausgabe and the current English translations where available, all of which are listed in the bibliography at the end of this issue of the journal. I cite Sein und Zeit in the Niemeyer 11th edition and in the ET by Macquarrie-Robinson.Sinn and Bedeutung are closely related, although Sinn is broader than Bedeutung. Sinn refers either to intelligibility as such or to the fact of something being intelligible, whereas Bedeutung is the specific meaning that a thing has. Sinn as intelligibility is generally interchangeable with Bedeutsamkeit and Verständlichkeit. Thus I translate Sinn as “intelligibility” or “meaningfulness.” Sinn in turn allows for Bedeutung as the particular meaning of a specific thing.I take “intellect” in the broad sense of νοῦς and in the specific sense of λόγος understood as discursive intellect, whether practical or theoretical.Dasein, Existenz, and Da-sein are all translated as "ex-sistence." The context indicates whether that is meant in an existentiel or an existential sense. The word “man” refers to human being, not the male of the species. I render das Seiende as “beings,” “things,” and “entities” ex aequo. All German words referring to ἀλήϑεια (e.g., Wahrheit, Erschlossenheit, Unverborgenheit, Entborgenheit, etc.) are translated by “disclosedness” or “openness.” Translations from the German are often my own.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Heidegger Never Got Beyond Facticity.Thomas Sheehan - 2019 - Philosophical Investigations 13 (28):45-58.
Heidegger and his Heirs.Theodore Kisiel - 2010 - Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Myśli Społecznej 55:243-252.
A paradigm shift in Heidegger research.Thomas Sheehan - 2001 - Continental Philosophy Review 34 (2):183-202.
Gender and Time.Kevin Aho - 2007 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):137-155.
Reaffirming “The Truth of Being”.Richard Capobianco - 2014 - Continental Philosophy Review 47 (3-4):275-292.
The Holy in Heidegger: The Open Clearing as Excess and Abyss.John W. M. Krummel - 2022 - In Richard Capobianco (ed.), Heidegger and the Holy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 5-26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-10-28

Downloads
119 (#182,029)

6 months
16 (#190,991)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?