Minimizing harm via psychological intervention: Response to Glannon

Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):662-663 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent discussion, Walter Glannon discusses a number of ways we might try to minimize harm to patients who experience intraoperative awareness. In this response I direct attention to a possibility that deserves further attention. It might be that a kind of psychological intervention – namely, informing patients of the possibility of intraoperative awareness and of what to expect in such a case – would constitute a unique way to respect patient autonomy, as well as minimize the harm that typically follows intraoperative awareness events.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The harm of intraoperative awareness.Neil Levy - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):660-661.
Intraoperative awareness: consciousness, memory and law.Walter Glannon - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):663-664.
Factors determining the probability of recollection of intraoperative events.L. Goldman - 1990 - In B. Bonke, W. Fitch & K. Millar (eds.), Memory and Awareness In Anesthesia. Swets & Zeitlinger. pp. 45--9.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-10

Downloads
743 (#33,654)

6 months
95 (#65,036)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joshua Shepherd
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Anaesthesia, amnesia and harm.Walter Glannon - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):651-657.

Add more references