Are the laws of logic necessary or contingent?

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (3):379–384 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To answer the question, we need first to consider the notion of necessity and the related notion of contingency. These are so-called "modal" notions. Other modal notions include those of possibility, impossibility, non-necessity, and noncontingency. All play a crucial role in philosophical thinking about matters to do with logic, metaphysics, morality, law, etc. This is because none of these modal notions is univocal in meaning. There are, so to speak, different "species" of the generic notions of necessity, contingency, possibility, and the rest

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reference, contingency, and the two-dimensional framework.Martin Davies - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 118 (1-2):83-131.
The Contingency of Possibility.Jean-Yves Béziau - 2016 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 20 (1):99-115.
Necessity and contingency.M. J. Cresswell - 1988 - Studia Logica 47 (2):145 - 149.
Logical Necessity.Ian Rumfitt - 2010 - In Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann (eds.), Modality: metaphysics, logic, and epistemology. qnew York: Oxford University Press.
How many notions of necessity?Jordan Stein - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (2):605-627.
The Crash of Modal Metaphysics.James F. Ross - 1989 - Review of Metaphysics 43 (2):251 - 279.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
471 (#60,214)

6 months
18 (#160,410)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references