Galloping sophistry: A rat in the lab is worth two in the dump

Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 8 (2):47-54 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author comments on the work of G. G. Gallup and S. D. Suarez, specifically focusing on animal rights issues. Gallup and Suarez argue for the status quo in research practices involving nonhuman animals; while K. J. Shapiro and others take a reformist position that the suffering of and the reliance on animals in psychology laboratories can and ought to be diminished. 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animal rights: Another view.Andrew N. Rowan - 1986 - Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 6 (1):37-37.
Animal rights.Gordon G. Gallup - 1986 - Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 6 (1):36-36.
Animal rights revisited.Kenneth J. Shapiro - 1986 - Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 6 (2):112-112.
Response to Dr. Gallup on animal rights.John F. Crosby - 1986 - Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 6 (2):113-113.
Epistemology is more than method: A reply to Yanchar and Kristensen.Lisa Tsoi Hoshmand & Jack Martin - 1996 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 16 (2):103-110.
From agency/empowerment to embodied empowerment.Mary Sue Richardson - 1994 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 14 (1):79-82.
Meehl revisited: A look at paradigms in psychology.Tracy B. Henley - 1989 - Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 9 (1):30-36.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
38 (#597,502)

6 months
1 (#1,890,996)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references