Choice Effects and the Ineffectiveness of Simulation: Response to Kühberger et al

Mind and Language 10 (4):437-445 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: Kühberger et al. show that producing the Langer effect is considerably more difficult than has been assumed. Although their results clearly demonstrate a need for further exploration of the Langer effect, none of their arguments undermines the evidence against simulation theory that we presented in Nichols et al. . In our study the actor subjects did show an effect, but the prediction subjects did not predict it, despite the fact that they were provided with all the details of the actor's situation. Further, we report additional evidence that corroborates our empirical case against simulation theory

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
11 (#1,415,873)

6 months
3 (#1,471,287)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Replies to the papers in the issue "Recanati on Mental Files".François Recanati - 2015 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (4):408-437.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references