A Critical Study of Four Definitions of Privacy From The Viewpoint of Western Ethics

Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 21 (4):103-128 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article addresses four definitions of privacy. Initially, the literal meaning of privacy is mentioned; It then discusses the meaning of the term “privacy” in Ethics. The first meaning is the right to be alone and free. The second meaning of privacy is informational and is divided into two types: one is the definition based on expectation and another is a definition based on the state of awareness. The third type is the definition that defines privacy based on control. In this paper, these definitions are reviewed one by one and the limitations noted by others are expressed and evaluated. The fourth type is a multi-dimensional or clustered definition. According to this definition, we should define privacy on a descriptive rather than a normative basis and avoid using any normative concept in its definition. According to this kind of definition, we can break the concept of privacy into three independent components. These three elements are secrecy, anonymity, and loneliness. Although this definition is not devoid of deficits, it is the most comprehensive one in this article because it refers to more privacy-related features Privacy, the right to loneliness, control, anonymity, secrecy, cluster definition.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,945

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Privacy as Informational Commodity.Jarek Gryz - 2013 - Proceedings of IACAP Conference.
Re-reading Westin.Lisa M. Austin - 2019 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 20 (1):53-81.
Emergent Privacy.Ran Wolff - 2015 - Journal of Philosophy 112 (3):141-158.
Privacy as an Asset.Jarek Gryz - 2017 - In Mindel Marcellus, Lyons Kelly & Wigglesworth Joe, Proceedings of the 27th CASCON Conference. IBM/ACM. pp. 266-271.
A cognitive access definition of privacy.Madison Powers - 1996 - Law and Philosophy 15 (4):369 - 386.
Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation.Julie C. Inness - 1992 - New York, US: OUP Usa.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-07

Downloads
13 (#1,399,496)

6 months
6 (#700,616)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What Is the Right to Privacy?Andrei Marmor - 2015 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 43 (1):3-26.
Privacy, morality, and the law.W. A. Parent - 1983 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (4):269-288.
Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation.Julie C. Inness - 1992 - New York, US: OUP Usa.
Privacy: Its Meaning and Value.Adam D. Moore - 2003 - American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (3):215 - 227.
Privacy and Freedom.Alan F. Westin - 1970 - Science and Society 34 (3):360-363.

View all 6 references / Add more references