- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A Brave New World of Bespoke Babies?
American Journal of Bioethics 17 (1):19-20 (2017)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Brave new world : decolonising Shakespeare in the drama education curriculum.Nellie Ngcongo-James & Dee Pratt - 2021 - In Kehdinga George Fomunyam & Simon Bheki Khoza, Curriculum Theory, Curriculum Theorising, and the Theoriser: The African Theorising Perspective. Boston: Brill | Sense.
How brave a new world?: dilemmas in bioethics.Richard A. McCormick - 1981 - Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
'O brave new world': Rationality in reproduction.Albert R. Jonsen - 1996 - In David C. Thomasma & Thomasine Kimbrough Kushner, Birth to death: science and bioethics. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 50--57.
Two by McCormickHow Brave a New World? Dilemmas in BioethicsNotes on Moral Theology, 1965 through 1980.James F. Childress & Richard A. McCormick - 1982 - Hastings Center Report 12 (3):40.
Brave New World of Genetic Engineering.David A. Prentice - 2001 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 1 (4):529-539.
Re-Creating Medicine: Ethical Issues at the Frontiers of Medicine.Gregory E. Pence - 2007 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Modern Pregnancies and (Im)Perfect Babies.Stephanie A. Kraft - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (1):1-2.
What is Living and What is Dead in Brave New World.Mark Walker - 2013 - In Happy-People-Pills for All. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 19–40.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-12-21
Downloads
53 (#434,126)
6 months
10 (#312,841)
2016-12-21
Downloads
53 (#434,126)
6 months
10 (#312,841)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Modern Pregnancies and (Im)Perfect Babies.Stephanie A. Kraft - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (1):1-2.
Ethics experts and fetal patients: a proposal for modesty.Angus Clarke & Dagmar Schmitz - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-7.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Framework for Unrestricted Prenatal Whole-Genome Sequencing: Respecting and Enhancing the Autonomy of Prospective Parents”.Stephanie C. Chen & David T. Wasserman - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (1):1-3.
Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Fetal Whole Genome Sequencing: An Interpretive Critical Review of the Ethical, Legal, Social, and Policy Implications.Hazar Haidar & Renata Iskander - 2022 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 5 (1):1-15.
References found in this work
A Framework for Unrestricted Prenatal Whole-Genome Sequencing: Respecting and Enhancing the Autonomy of Prospective Parents.Stephanie C. Chen & David T. Wasserman - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (1):3-18.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-6fxz5 uwo