Are some Propensities Probabilities?

In Radu J. Bogdan & Ilkka Niiniluoto, Logic, language, and probability. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Pub. Co.. pp. 115--120 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,101

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Don't take unnecessary chances!Henry E. Kyburg - 2002 - Synthese 132 (1-2):9-26.
Propensities are Probabilities.Jason Konek - manuscript
Probabilities, Causes and Propensities in Physics.Mauricio Suárez - 2010 - In Probabilities, Causes and Propensities in Physics. New York: Springer.
Probability Assignments and the Principle of Indifference. An Examination of Two Eliminative Strategies.Sorin Bangu - 2010 - In Mauricio Suárez, Probabilities, Causes and Propensities in Physics. New York: Springer. pp. 61-76.
Don't Take Unnecessary Chances!Henry E. Kyburg Jr - 2002 - Synthese 132 (1/2):9 - 26.
Propensity, probability, and quantum physics.J. Barretto Bastos Filho & F. Selleri - 1995 - Foundations of Physics 25 (5):701-716.
The propensity theory: a decision-theoretic restatement.M. Albert - 2007 - Synthese 156 (3):587-603.
Why propensities cannot be probabilities, Paul Humphreys proposed accounts of probability are usually required to satisfy the standard axioms of the probability calculus. Because of the fundamentally causal nature of propensities, they cannot do this, primarily because in-version formulas such as the multiplication axiom and bayes' theorem do.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 1985 - Philosophical Review 94 (4).
New Foundations of Objective Probability: Axioms for Propensities.Patrick Suppes - 1973 - Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics 74:515-529.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
18 (#1,196,195)

6 months
5 (#826,578)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Propensity theories of probability unscathed: A reply to white.Tom Settle - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (4):331-335.
Popper versus Peirce on the probability of single cases.Tom Settle - 1977 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (2):177-180.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references