Writing systems: Not optimal, but good enough – Erratum

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (6):467-467 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0140525x12002725

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Writing systems: Not optimal, but good enough.Mark S. Seidenberg & Ram Frost - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):305.
Interactionism is good, but not good enough.Esther Thelen - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (4):650-650.
Is Now-or-Never language processing good enough?Fernanda Ferreira & Kiel Christianson - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39.
Erratum: Apology.James D. McCawley - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (1):199-199.
Erratum.Paul Bloom - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (2):245-245.
Erratum.Robyn M. Dawes - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (1):187-187.
Language as a mental travel guide—ERRATUM.Charles P. Davis, Gerry T. M. Altmann & Eiling Yee - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43:e154.
Smiling reflects different emotions in men and women – ERRATUM.Simine Vazire, Laura P. Naumann, Peter J. Rentfrow & Samuel D. Gosling - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (6):469-469.
Optimal confusion.Stephanie Stolarz-Fantino & Edmund Fantino - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (2):234-234.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
36 (#630,317)

6 months
10 (#415,916)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Writing systems: Not optimal, but good enough.Mark S. Seidenberg & Ram Frost - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):305.

Add more references