On Humans and Machines

Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 26 (2):207-231 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the present article we examine the anthropological implications of “intelligent” neurotechnologies (INTs). For this purpose, we first give an introduction to current developments of INTs by specifying their central characteristics. We then present and discuss traditional anthropological concepts such as the “homo faber,” the concept of humans as “deficient beings,” and the concept of the “cyborg,” questioning their descriptive relevance regarding current neurotechnological applications. To this end, we relate these anthropological concepts to the characteristics of INTs elaborated before. As we show, the explanatory validity of the anthropological concepts analyzed in this article vary significantly. While the concept of the homo faber, for instance, is not capable of adequately describing the anthropological implications of new INTs, the cyborg proves to be capable of grasping several aspects of today’s neurotechnologies. Nevertheless, alternative explanatory models are needed in order to capture the new characteristics of INTs in their full complexity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Humans, Animals, Machines. [REVIEW]Jami Weinstein - 2008 - Environmental Philosophy 5 (2):177-180.
Limits of Neural Computation in Humans and Machines.Roman Taraban - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (5):2547-2553.
Persuasion and the expressivity of gestures in humans and machines.Isabella Poggi & Pelachaud & Catherine - 2008 - In Ipke Wachsmuth, Manuela Lenzen & Günther Knoblich (eds.), Embodied Communication in Humans and Machines. Oxford University Press.
Representational content in humans and machines.Mark H. Bickhard - 1993 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 5:285-33.
Can Humans Think Machines Think?Jane Voytek - 1979 - Teaching Philosophy 3 (2):153-167.
Can Humans Think Machines Think?Jane Voytek - 1988 - University Press of America.
Humans, Animals, Machines: Blurring Boundaries.Glen A. Mazis - 2008 - State University of New York Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-16

Downloads
37 (#611,759)

6 months
9 (#492,507)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references