How to Derive Ought from Is

In James Rachels (ed.), Ethical theory. New York: Oxford University Press (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

1964

Other Versions

original Searle, John R. (1964) "How to derive "ought" from "is"". Philosophical Review 73(1):43-58

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

How to derive "ought" from "is".John R. Searle - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (1):43-58.
How to Derive “Ought” from “Is” Revisited.John R. Searle - 2021 - In Paolo Di Lucia & Edoardo Fittipaldi (eds.), Revisiting Searle on Deriving “Ought” From “Is”. Springer Verlag. pp. 3-16.
How to Derive 'Ought' from 'May'.William G. Lycan - 1977 - Ratio (Misc.) 19 (1):55.
An Interpretation of the Moral Philosophy of David Hume: How to Derive 'Ought' From 'Is'.Bonnie Jean Gray - 1973 - Dissertation, Syracuse University
Problems with Searle’s Derivation?Edmund Wall - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (3):571-580.
Existence as a Source of Normativity: An Alternative to Searle’s View.Roberta De Monticelli - 2021 - In Paolo Di Lucia & Edoardo Fittipaldi (eds.), Revisiting Searle on Deriving “Ought” From “Is”. Springer Verlag. pp. 121-138.
Revisiting Searle on Deriving “Ought” From “Is”.Paolo Di Lucia & Edoardo Fittipaldi (eds.) - 2021 - Springer Verlag.
Hume’s Law Violated?Rik Peels - 2014 - Journal of Value Inquiry 48 (3):449-455.
It Does Not Matter Whether We Can Derive 'Ought' from 'Is'.Alison Jaggar - 1974 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):373 - 379.
Hume and Searle : the ‘Is-Ought’ Gap versus Speech Act Theory.Daniel Schulthess - 2011

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The other question: can and should robots have rights?David J. Gunkel - 2018 - Ethics and Information Technology 20 (2):87-99.
Proxy Agency in Collective Action.Kirk Ludwig - 2013 - Noûs 48 (1):75-105.
How to Prove Hume’s Law.Gillian Russell - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (3):603-632.
Logic and the autonomy of ethics.Charles R. Pigden - 1989 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67 (2):127 – 151.
Truthmaking and the is—ought gap.Kit Fine - 2018 - Synthese 198 (2):887-914.

View all 75 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references