What's in the Two Envelope Paradox?

&
Analysis 57 (1):34-41 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/57.1.34

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Two Envelope 'Paradox'.Frank Jackson, Peter Menzies & Graham Oppy - 1994 - Analysis 54 (1):43 - 45.
The Two-Envelope Paradox.John Broome - 1995 - Analysis 55 (1):6 - 11.
The two envelope 'paradox'.Frank Jackson & Alonso Church - 1994 - Analysis 54 (1):43-45.
The two-envelope paradox resolved.Timothy J. McGrew, David Shier & Harry S. Silverstein - 1997 - Analysis 57 (1):28–33.
The Two Envelope Paradox: The Infinite Case.Paul Castell & Diderik Batens - 1994 - Analysis 54 (1):46 - 49.
The two envelope paradox: the infinite case.Paul Castell & Alonso Church - 1994 - Analysis 54 (1):46-49.
An Enquiry Into the Life and Legend of Michael Scot.James Wood Brown - 1897
Myles Burnyeat y Michael Frede: The Pseudo-Platonic Seventh Letter, Scott, D. , Oxford University Press, 2015, XV, 224 pp. [REVIEW]Thomas Alexander Szlezák - 2019 - Areté. Revista de Filosofía 31 (1):257-271.
The Two Envelope Paradox and Infinite Expectations.Frank Arntzenius & David McCarthy - 1997 - Analysis 57 (1):42-50.
The other Christian socialist: Alexander John Scott.J. Philip Newell - 1983 - Heythrop Journal 24 (3):278–289.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
183 (#132,602)

6 months
29 (#119,305)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Two Envelopes and Binding.Casper Storm Hansen - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):508-518.
Opening Two Envelopes.Paul Syverson - 2010 - Acta Analytica 25 (4):479-498.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Two-Envelope Paradox.John Broome - 1995 - Analysis 55 (1):6 - 11.

Add more references