The Philosophy and Economics of Market Socialism: A Critical Study

New York, US: Oxford University Press USA (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

N. Scott Arnold argues that the most defensible version of a market socialist economic system would be unable to realize widely held socialist ideals and values. In particular, it would be responsible for widespread and systematic exploitation. The charge of exploitation, which is really a charge of injustice, has typically been made against capitalist systems by socialists. This book argues that it is market socialism--the only remaining viable form of socialism--that is systematically exploitative.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,748

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Socialism.Andreas Albertsen & Jens Jørund Tyssedal - 2024 - Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
Market socialism.N. Scott Arnold - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (4):517-557.
On Ownership Theory in Market Socialism from the Evolutional Perspective.Wei-min Jing & Wei-min Tian - 2008 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 3:98-107.
Socialism.Samuel Arnold - 2016 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
"Homo Economicus", Political Economy and Socialism.Euclid Tsakalotos - 2004 - Science and Society 68 (2):137 - 160.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-14

Downloads
25 (#951,019)

6 months
5 (#815,914)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Republic of Equals.Nicholas Vrousalis - 2018 - Philosophical Review 127 (1):125-130.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references