Referee report on an earlier draft of Peters and Ceci's target article

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):238-238 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0140525x00011651

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Making the plausible implausible: A favorable review of Peters and Ceci's target article.Jason Millman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):225-226.
A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci's peer-review study.Robert K. Adair - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):196-196.
Some procedural obscurities in Peters and Ceci's peer-review study.Murray J. White - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):241-241.
A challenge to Peters and Ceci's conclusions with an examination of editorial files for reviewer appropriateness.Robert Boice, Gayle Pecker, Ellen Zaback & David H. Barlow - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):744-745.
Referee agreement in context.Lowell L. Hargens - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):150-151.
A theory of stories?Alan Garnham - 1986 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9 (4):739-740.
Computer-assisted referee selection as a means of reducing potential editorial bias.H. Russell Bernard - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):202-202.
Implications of neural reuse for brain injury therapy: Historical note on the work of Kurt Goldstein.Barry Lia - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):281-282.
Reviewer “bias”: Do Peters and Ceci protest too much?Daniel Perlman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):231-232.
Attention and perceptual adaptation.Ned Block & Susanna Siegel - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):205-206.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
21 (#1,009,308)

6 months
6 (#869,904)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations.Robert King Merton - 1973 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Norman W. Storer.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.

View all 22 references / Add more references