Moral Values: Situationally Defined Individual Differences

Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (2):497-520 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract:This article suggests that there are individual differences in how people define important moral values, and that these differences are made manifest in differences in the situations. It identifies five dimensions along which individuals can differ in their understandings of values: 1)value category(where the value lies in the hierarchy), 2)agent(how voluntary the action is and whether it is morally required of the agent), 3)object(how close the self is to the object of the action; whether the action offends God) 4)effect(whether the effect of the action is to harm or help), and 5)intention(whether the intention of the action is to harm or help). It then addresses four important values entailing moral dimensions: respect for life, respect for property, honest communication, and respect for religion. The article suggests that empirical research, classroom teaching, and business practice can be strengthened by considering these dimensions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,830

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Organizational Moral Values.Elizabeth D. Scott - 2002 - Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (1):33-55.
Self-Selection Bias in Business Ethics Research.Harvey S. James - 2006 - Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (4):559-577.
Promoting Professional Socialization.Dayoung Kim - 2022 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 41 (1):93-114.
Universal Moral Values for Corporate Codes of Ethics.Mark S. Schwartz - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 59 (1-2):27-44.
Hard like water: ethics in business.Vincent Di Norcia - 1998 - Toronto: Oxford University Press Canada.
Kant on Moral Respect.Anastasia Berg - 2021 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 103 (4):730-760.
Moral responsibility and moral development in Epicurus’ philosophy.Susanne Bobzien - 2006 - In Burkhard Reis & Stella Haffmans (eds.), The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Homo relationalis.Karen Joisten - 2018 - Eco-Ethica 7:83-94.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-01

Downloads
44 (#501,026)

6 months
5 (#1,025,536)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
A Treatise of Human Nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (33):379-380.
Ethics.William Frankena - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (1):74-74.

View all 25 references / Add more references