Commentary: The Wizard of Oughts

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (3):232-235 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00664.x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Ethical Expertise Revisited: Reply to Giles Scofield.Norbert L. Steinkamp, Bert Gordijn & Henk A. J. M. ten Have - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (4):385-392.
Eyes wide shut: Scofield on Engelhardt. [REVIEW]Kevin Wm Wildes - 2002 - HEC Forum 14 (4):363-366.
A reply to Giles R. Scofield, J.d.Francoise Baylis, Jeanne DesBrisay, Benjamin Freedman, Larry Lowenstein & Susan Sherwin - 1994 - HEC Forum 6 (6):371-376.
After voids: Scofield vs. Engelhardt. [REVIEW]Stephen A. Erickson - 2002 - HEC Forum 14 (4):359-362.
Philosophy vs. religion in bioethics: Scofield vs. Engelhardt. [REVIEW]Nicholas Capaldi - 2002 - HEC Forum 14 (4):367-370.
Rebuttal: Expert Ethics Testimony.Françoise Baylis - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (3):240-242.
500 Hats: Exploring the Challenges of Boundary and Community—Reflections on Professionalization. [REVIEW]Ann Heesters - 2012 - HEC Forum 24 (3):171-178.
Commentary.Christopher H. Asplen - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (3):222-223.
Response to a ‘Commentary’ and Letters.George L. Mendz & David W. Kissane - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (4):802-804.
Commentary: Double Effect—Intention is the Solution, Not the Problem.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (1):26-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
47 (#467,552)

6 months
10 (#399,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Should research ethics committees be told how to think?G. M. Sayers - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (1):39-42.
Expert Testimony by Ethicists: What Should Be the Norm?Edward J. Imwinkelried - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (2):198-221.
Expert Bioethics Testimony.Stephen R. Latham - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (2):242-247.
Professionalism in Forensic Bioethics.Bethany J. Spielman - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (3):420-439.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references