Whatever Should We Do with Cartesian Method?—Reclaiming Descartes for the History of Science

In Stephen Voss, Essays on the philosophy and science of René Descartes. New York: Oxford University Press (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter describes the discovery, perfection, and application of the scientific method as the Scientific Revolution happens. Bacon, Galileo, Harvey, Huygens, and Newton were singularly successful in persuading posterity that they contributed to the invention of a single, transferable, and efficacious scientific method. The treatment of Descartes' method by historians of science and historians of philosophy has been no exception to this pattern. The Discours de la methode has been seen as one of the most important methodological treatises in the Western intellectual tradition, and the Cartesian method has been viewed as doubly successful and significant within that tradition. First, Descartes' method has been taken to mark an early stage in that long maturation of the scientific method resulting from interaction between application of method in scientific work and critical reflection about method carried out by great methodologists, from Bacon and Descartes down to Popper and Lakatos. Second, Descartes' considerable achievements in the sciences and in mathematics during a crucial stage of the Scientific Revolution of the 17th century have been taken to have depended upon his method. This chapter discusses the tendency of historians and philosophers to create a cult of the thoughts of thinkers and revive the link between theorizing about the purported scientific method and requiring a method-centric history of science. It explains further that in all cults, there is a doctrine of truth and it informs us of what we already know and that there is an open ended set of rules.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,748

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cartesian analysis and synthesis.Athanassios Raftopoulos - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):265-308.
The Concept of Method Among the Cartesians, 1650-1690.Darrell Anthony Lariviere - 1998 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
Failure in Science and Why It Is a Good Thing.Karim Bschir - 2018 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 61 (2):301-310.
Descartes and Method in 1637.Daniel Garber - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:225-236.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
25 (#951,019)

6 months
20 (#145,628)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references