The Structure of McTaggart's Argument

Review of Metaphysics 24 (4):668 - 677 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

THE RECURRENT CLAIM that time is unreal has, by many, been judged as unintelligible and arguments in its favor as fallacious.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Merleau-Ponty. [REVIEW]Duane H. Davis - 2005 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (1):192-194.
The Later Philosophy of R. G. Collingwood. [REVIEW]W. L. M. - 1963 - Review of Metaphysics 17 (2):302-302.
The Death Blow to Communism. [REVIEW]D. G. R. - 1959 - Review of Metaphysics 12 (3):487-487.
Killing Time.Cliff Stagoll - 1998 - Philosophy Now 20:28-30.
Art and Argument. [REVIEW]Sudhakar Marathe - 2007 - Review of Metaphysics 61 (1):130-132.
The Uses of Argument. [REVIEW]C. L. - 1958 - Review of Metaphysics 11 (4):697-697.
The Philosophy of Time. [REVIEW]H. P. K. - 1968 - Review of Metaphysics 21 (4):762-762.
The Coming World Transformation. [REVIEW]D. D. G. - 1964 - Review of Metaphysics 17 (3):478-479.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
26 (#854,850)

6 months
3 (#1,473,720)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references