The evidentiary standard of special design is a little bit like heaven

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):526-527 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Adaptationist explanations for well-known phenomena are of limited value to psychological science. To be truly useful, evolutionary psychological research programs must produce novel discoveries about contemporary cognitive and behavioral processes. The concept of special design is especially useful. Even if special design cannot be convincingly demonstrated, rigorous attempts to meet this evidentiary standard can produce novel scientific contributions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Special design's centuries of success.Edward H. Hagen - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):519-520.
Lack of evidentiary criteria for exaptations?James L. Dannemiller - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):512-513.
Folk psychology meets folk darwinism.Jay Hegdé & Norman A. Johnson - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):476-477.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
43 (#523,082)

6 months
8 (#605,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references