Some Thoughts on Strauss on Rousseau

Idealistic Studies 44 (2-3):235-248 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Strauss faults Rousseau for an overly indeterminate view of nature, which stems from what Strauss sees as a defect in Rousseau’s understanding of the relationship between philosophy and the requirements of civil society. This article considers these issues in light of Rousseau’s broader rhetorical strategy, and explores Rousseau’s attempt to elucidate the possibility of a modern political philosophy that is distinct from science on the one hand and civic moralizing on the other.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rousseau on Education, Freedom, and Judgment.Denise Schaeffer - 2014 - University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Rousseau and Hobbes: Nature, Free Will, and the Passions.Robin Douglass - 2015 - Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Rousseau’s Emile, or the Fear of Passions.Daniel Tröhler - 2012 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (5):477-489.
Taking Rousseau Seriously.T. O'hagan - 2004 - History of Political Thought 25 (1):73-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-20

Downloads
33 (#694,936)

6 months
13 (#276,161)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references