Sign-inferences in Greek and Buddhist Logic

History and Philosophy of Logic 46 (1):35-67 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Yogācāra school of logic developed a theory of sign-inferences that has many features of the Stoic and Epicurean logical teachings with small inclusions of Aristotelian ideas. In the Nyāyabindu of Dharmakīrti, we can find the following schemes of formal reasoning: modus Barbara (Figure I) and modus Camenes (Figure IV) of the Aristotelian syllogistic, and all the inference rules of the Stoic logic: modus ponens, modus tollens, modus ponendo tollens, modus tollendo ponens I, modus tollendo ponens II. The three premises of Yogācāra inference (if p, then q; there is an example that p and q occur together; p; then q) corresponds to the Epicurean doctrine of three premises with a necessary exemplification. Thus, the paper is a comparative study of Greek and Buddhist theory of sign-inferences, showing a deep similarity between them.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-17

Downloads
34 (#698,174)

6 months
7 (#469,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Stoic Sign-Inference and Their Lore of Fate.Andrew Schumann - 2024 - Logica Universalis 18 (1):209-234.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Does Logic Have a History at All?Jens Lemanski - forthcoming - Foundations of Science:1-23.
Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge.K. N. Jayatilleke - 1963 - Foundations of Language 5 (4):560-562.
Aristotle "On Rhetoric": A Theory of Civic Discourse.George A. Kennedy - 1993 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 26 (4):322-327.

View all 7 references / Add more references