Playing with Cards: Discrimination Claims and the Charge of Bad Faith

Social Theory and Practice 42 (2):285-303 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A common response to claims of bias, harassment, or discrimination is to say that these claims are made in bad faith. Claimants are supposedly not motivated by a credible or even sincere belief that unfair or unequal treatment has occurred, but simply seek to illicitly gain public sympathy or private reward. Characterizing discrimination claims as systematically made in bad faith enables them to be screened and dismissed prior to engaging with them on their merits. This retort preserves the dominant group’s self-image as unprejudiced and innocent without having to risk critical analysis of the claim’s substance.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Religion and discrimination: extending the ‘disaggregative approach’.Daniel Sabbagh - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (1):109-118.
Multiplicity: A New Reading of Sartrean Bad Faith.Benjamin K. Elwyn - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (3):601-618.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-05

Downloads
1,020 (#21,863)

6 months
119 (#49,511)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Schraub
Lewis & Clark College

Citations of this work

Microaggressions as negligence.David Schraub - forthcoming - Journal of Social Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references