On the three types of juristic thought

Westport, Conn.: Praeger Publishers. Edited by Joseph W. Bendersky (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Distinctions among juristic ways of thinking -- Classification of juristic ways of thinking in the overall development of legal history.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#629,586)

6 months
2 (#1,687,048)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Law’s Capacity for Vagueness.Doris Liebwald - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (2):391-423.
Hobbes's paradox redux.Roberto Farneti - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (2-3):337-355.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references