On is an ought: Levels of analysis and the descriptive versus normative analysis of human reasoning

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):101-102 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Algorithmic-level specifications carry part of the explanatory burden in most psychological theories. It is, thus, inappropriate to limit a comparison and evaluation of theories to the computational level. A rational analysis considers people's goal-directed and environmentally adaptive rationality; it is not normative. Adaptive rationality is by definition non-absolute; hence, neither deductive logic nor Bayesian probability theory has absolute normative status

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does rational analysis stand up to rational analysis?Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):88-89.
What are the mechanics of quantum cognition?Daniel Joseph Navarro & Ian Fuss - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):299-300.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-13

Downloads
37 (#611,759)

6 months
6 (#866,322)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?