On a Chang Conjecture. II

Archive for Mathematical Logic 37 (4):215-220 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Continuing [7], we here prove that the Chang Conjecture $(\aleph_3,\aleph_2) \Rightarrow (\aleph_2,\aleph_1)$ together with the Continuum Hypothesis, $2^{\aleph_0} = \aleph_1$ , implies that there is an inner model in which the Mitchell ordering is $\geq \kappa^{+\omega}$ for some ordinal $\kappa$

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Borel's conjecture in topological groups.Fred Galvin & Marion Scheepers - 2013 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 78 (1):168-184.
Potential continuity of colorings.Stefan Geschke - 2008 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 47 (6):567-578.
Martin's axiom and $\Delta^2_1$ well-ordering of the reals.Uri Abraham & Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 35 (5):287-298.
On almost precipitous ideals.Asaf Ferber & Moti Gitik - 2010 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (3):301-328.
Consecutive Singular Cardinals and the Continuum Function.Arthur W. Apter & Brent Cody - 2013 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 54 (2):125-136.
A test for expandability.Enrique Casanovas - 1998 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 37 (4):221-234.
Indestructibility and the linearity of the Mitchell ordering.Arthur W. Apter - 2024 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 63 (3):473-482.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
32 (#752,903)

6 months
6 (#622,431)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Consistency strength of higher chang’s conjecture, without CH.Sean D. Cox - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (7-8):759-775.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The covering lemma up to a Woodin cardinal.W. J. Mitchell, E. Schimmerling & J. R. Steel - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 84 (2):219-255.

Add more references