More Thoughts on HPS: Another 20 Years Later

Perspectives on Science 19 (4):453-481 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay offers some reflections on the recent history of the disputes about the relation between history and philosophy of science (HPS) and the merits and prospects of HPS as an intellectual endeavor. As everyone knows, the issue was hotly debated in the 1960s and 1970s. That was the hey-day of the slogan "history without philosophy of science is blind, philosophy without history of science is empty" as well as of the many variations on the theme of HPS as a "marriage of convenience," "intimate relation," or "marriage for the sake of reason." There was a flurry of interest in the early 1990s, as evidenced by sections in the 1992 and 1994 issues of PSA, entitled: "Do the History of Science and the Philosophy of ..

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,748

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thoughts on HPS: 20 years later.Larry Laudan - 1989 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 20 (1):9-13.
History and Philosophy of Science. Zwischen Deskription und Konstruktion.Friedrich Stadler - 2012 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 35 (3):217-238.
The Kuhnian mode of HPS.Samuel Schindler - 2013 - Synthese 190 (18):4137-4154.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-09-24

Downloads
215 (#123,070)

6 months
22 (#136,558)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jutta Schickore
Indiana University, Bloomington

References found in this work

Objectivity.Lorraine Daston & Peter Galison - 2007 - Cambridge, Mass.: Zone Books. Edited by Peter Galison.
Considered Judgment.Catherine Z. Elgin - 1999 - Princeton University Press.
Human understanding.Stephen Toulmin - 1972 - Princeton, N.J.,: Princeton University Press.

View all 34 references / Add more references