Hiv vaccine trials: Reconsidering the therapeutic misconception and the question of what constitutes trial related injuries

Developing World Bioethics 7 (3):ii–iv (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ethical challenge is squarely focused on the question of what is owed to participants of vaccine trials who happen to become infected during the course of the trial. Not surprisingly, given the prominence of HIV/AIDS in many parts of the developing world, HIV vaccine trials have become the focal point of this debate. It is worth noting from the outset, however, that the same arguments that apply to HIV vaccines would apply to any number of microbicide trials aimed at protecting women against a large variety of sexually transmitted illnesses.1 One of the controversial questions in this debate has been the issue of whether or not an infection acquired by vaccine trial participants during the course of the trial can reasonably be considered a trial related injury that ought to be subject to compensation (in the form of access to good quality AIDS treatments, including antiretrovirals).

Other Versions

original Udo SchÜklenk, Richard Ashcroft (2007) "Hiv Vaccine Trials: Reconsidering the Therapeutic Misconception and the Question of What Constitutes Trial Related Injuries". Developing World Bioethics 7(3):

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
43 (#520,994)

6 months
2 (#1,688,095)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

Justice in the Application of Science: Beyond Fair Benefits.Alex John London - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):54-56.

Add more citations