Donald Davidson's theory of mind is non-normative

Philosophers' Imprint 3:1-14 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Donald Davidson's theory of mind is widely regarded as a normative theory. This is a something of a confusion. Once a distinction has been made between the categorisation scheme of a norm and the norm's force-maker, it becomes clear that a Davidsonian theory of mind is not a normative theory after all. Making clear the distinction, applying it to Davidson's theory of mind, and showing its significance are the main purposes of this paper. In the concluding paragraphs, a sketch is given of how a truly normative Davidsonian theory of mind might be formulated

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The inadequacy of anomalous monism as a realist theory of mind.Louise M. Antony - 1994 - In Gerhard Preyer, Frank Siebelt & Alexander Ulfig (eds.), Language, Mind and Epistemology: On Donald Davidson’s Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Normativity and explanation of action.Mahdi Zākeri - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 7 (27):61-83.
Donald Davidson.Marc A. Joseph - 2004 - Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
Donald Davidson su metafora e monismo anomalo.Alessandro Cavazzana - 2016 - In Gabriella Airenti, Marco Cruciani & Maurizio Tirassa (eds.), Mind the Gap: Brain, Cognition and Society. pp. 117-123.
Anomalous Monism.Julie Yoo - 2007 - In Brian McLaughlin, Ansgar Beckermann & Sven Walter (eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
O que é o monismo anómalo?Ricardo Santos - 2005 - Philosophica 25:77-87.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
169 (#139,810)

6 months
5 (#1,050,400)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Timothy Schroeder
Rice University

Citations of this work

Doxastic deliberation.Nishi Shah & J. David Velleman - 2005 - Philosophical Review 114 (4):497-534.
Interpretivism and norms.Devin Sanchez Curry - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (4):905-930.
Action and Rationalization.Samuel Asarnow - 2021 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy (4):758-773.
On not getting out of bed.Samuel Asarnow - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (6):1639-1666.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references