Causation, truth, and the law

Abstract

Deciding matters of legal liability, in torts and other civil actions, requires deciding causation. The injury suffered by a plaintiff must be caused by an event or condition due to the defendant. The courts distinguish between cause-in-fact and proximate causation, where cause-in-fact is determined by the “but-for” test: the effect would not have happened, “but for” the cause.1 Proximate causation is a set of legal limitations on cause-in-fact.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Mistaking the Relevance of Proximate Causation.David Kyle Johnson - 2018-05-09 - In Robert Arp, Steven Barbone & Michael Bruce (eds.), Bad Arguments. Wiley. pp. 181–184.
Fact and Law in the Causal Inquiry.Alex Broadbent - 2009 - Legal Theory 15 (3):173-191.
Contrastive causation in the law.Jonathan Schaffer - 2010 - Legal Theory 16 (4):259-297.
Legal causation.Thomas Byrne - 2022 - Jurisprudence 14 (1):55-75.
Disjunctive Effects and the Logic of Causation.Roberta Ballarin - 2014 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (1):21-38.
Causation in AI and law.Jos Lehmann, Joost Breuker & Bob Brouwer - 2004 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (4):279-315.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
66 (#320,685)

6 months
4 (#1,249,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Scheines
Carnegie Mellon University

Citations of this work

The epistemology of scientific evidence.Douglas Walton & Nanning Zhang - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (2):173-219.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references