Can I Have Your Pain?

Philosophical Investigations 36 (1):201-209 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the so-called private language argument, Wittgenstein argues both against the alleged epistemological privacy of sensations and against their alleged ontological privacy, that is, the common view that somebody else cannot have my pain. A prominent proponent of the claim of sensations' ontological privacy was Gottlob Frege, whose position has recently been defended by Wolfgang Künne. This paper reconsiders Wittgenstein's objections to ontological privacy and attempts to defend Wittgenstein's position against Künne's Frege-inspired arguments

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-10-19

Downloads
96 (#220,440)

6 months
13 (#266,408)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Severin Schroeder
University of Reading

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1953 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 161:124-124.
Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy.Gottlob Frege - 1991 - Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by Brian McGuinness.
Wittgenstein, meaning and mind.P. M. S. Hacker (ed.) - 1990 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.
Logical investigations.Gottlob Frege - 1977 - Oxford: Blackwell. Edited by P. T. Geach.
Wittgenstein.Anthony Kenny - 1973 - Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

View all 13 references / Add more references