Anscombe’s Intention: A Guide

New York, USA: Oxford University Press (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Written against the background of her controversial opposition to the University of Oxford's awarding of an honorary degree to Harry S. Truman, Elizabeth Anscombe's /Intention/ laid the groundwork she thought necessary for a proper ethical evaluation of actions like the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The devoutly Catholic Anscombe thought that these actions made Truman a murderer, and thus unworthy of the university's honor — but that this verdict depended on an understanding of intentional action that had been widely rejected in contemporary moral philosophy. /Intention/ was her attempt to work out that understanding and argue for its superiority over a conception of intention as an inner mental state. Though recognized universally as one of the definitive works in analytic philosophy of action, Anscombe's book is often dismissed as unsystematic or obscure, and usually read through the lens of philosophical concerns very far from her own. Schwenkler's Guide offers a careful and critical presentation of Anscombe's main lines of argument at a level appropriate to advanced undergraduates but also capable of benefiting specialists in action theory, moral philosophy, and the history of analytic philosophy. Further, it situates /Intention/ in a context that emphasizes Anscombe's debts to Aristotle, Aquinas, and Wittgenstein, and her engagement with the work of contemporaries like Gilbert Ryle and R. M. Hare, inviting new avenues of engagement with the ideas of historically important philosophers.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein and Anscombe’s Intention.Marie McGinn - 2023 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 12:7-33.
Intention, freedom and predictability.Peter Geach - 2000 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 46:73-.
Nothing Added.Candace Vogler - 2016 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):229-247.
The Arithmetic of Intention.Anton Ford - 2015 - American Philosophical Quarterly 52 (2):129-143.
The Oxford Handbook of Elizabeth Anscombe.Roger Teichmann (ed.) - 2022 - New York, , NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press, USA.
Two notions of intentional action? Solving a puzzle in Anscombe’s Intention.Lucy Campbell - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (3):578-602.
Anscombe's Intention: A Guide. [REVIEW]Benjamin Schulz - 2021 - Philosophical Quarterly 71 (2):438-440.
Interpreting Anscombe’s Intention §32FF.Anne Newstead - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Research 34:157-176.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-22

Downloads
178 (#135,096)

6 months
20 (#148,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Schwenkler
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Citations of this work

The categories of causation.John Schwenkler - 2024 - Synthese 203 (9):1-35.
Separating action and knowledge.Mikayla Kelley - forthcoming - The Philosophical Quarterly.
Practical knowledge first.Carlotta Pavese - 2022 - Synthese 200 (5):1-18.
Mental action.Antonia Peacocke - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (6):e12741.
Factive Mindreading in the Folk Psychology of Action.Carlotta Pavese - forthcoming - In Artūrs Logins & Jacques Henri Vollet (eds.), Putting Knowledge to Work: New Directions for Knowledge-First Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references