Reply to Serena Olsaretti

Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (4):484-487 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper examines how the value of choice account is supposed to explain the significance of choice in the justification of moral principles and social institutions and policies, responding to some questions and objections raised by Serena Olsaretti.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,290

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Effort and imagination.George Sher - 2003 - In Serena Olsaretti (ed.), Desert and justice. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 205--217.
The dilemma of desert.Jonathan Wolff - 2003 - In Serena Olsaretti (ed.), Desert and justice. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 219--232.
Justice, markets, and the family: an interview with Serena Olsaretti.Serena Olsaretti - 2016 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 9 (2):181.
Scanlon on Responsibility and the Value of Choice.Serena Olsaretti - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (4):465-483.
Can Desert Solve the Problem of Stakes? A Reply to Olsaretti.Huub Brouwer & Willem van der Deijl - 2018 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 118 (3):399-405.
On the comparative element of justice.Owen McLeod - 2003 - In Serena Olsaretti (ed.), Desert and justice. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 123--123.
Review of Serena Olsaretti (ed.), Desert and Justice[REVIEW]Peter Simpson - 2004 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (7).

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
25 (#868,970)

6 months
3 (#1,465,011)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references