Should persons be sacrificed for the general welfare?

Journal of Value Inquiry 16 (2):149-152 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is argued that Robert Nozick is wrong in asserting that persons should not be sacrificed for the general welfare.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

From Nozick to welfare rights: Self‐ownership, property, and moral desert.Adrian Bardon - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (4):481-501.
The Separateness of Persons, Distributive Norms, and Moral Theory.David Brink - 1993 - In Raymond Gillespie Frey & Christopher W. Morris (eds.), Value, Welfare, and Morality. Cambridge University Press. pp. 252-289.
Welfare, Achievement, and Self-Sacrifice.Douglas W. Portmore - 2008 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 2 (2):1-29.
A Kantian Theory of Welfare?Thomas Hurka - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 130 (3):603-617.
On the Welfare of Possible Persons.Mary B. Mahowald - 1997 - Hastings Center Report 27 (1):2-2.
The General Welfare As A Constitutional Goal.Paul Weirich - 1991 - Social Philosophy Today 5:411-432.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
31 (#730,306)

6 months
12 (#301,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Charles Sayward
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references