Is it time to abandon institutional research ethics committees?

Monash Bioethics Review 21 (3):S74-S77 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Research on human beings has significantly increased in ethical and scientific complexity. Ethics review is at a fork in the road. Either we significantly increase the resources we provide to support institutional research ethics committees. Or we abandon the institutional base of human research ethics review and move to model of expert suprainstitutional ethics committees.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf03351281

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Increased review responsibilities for Australian institutional ethics committees.Leanna Darvall - 1995 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 17 (1):9.
What Can We Learn From the Discussion on Anglophone Ethics Committees? An Analysis of Selected (Contested) Issues.Adrianna Surmiak - 2023 - Diametros 19 (76):15-29.
Research ethics review and the bureaucracy.Paul M. McNeill - 2002 - Monash Bioethics Review 21 (3):S72-S73.
The wages of sin.E. L. Pattullo - 1985 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 7 (5):7-8.
Should Epidemiological Studies Be Subject to Ethics Review?Jan Piasecki, Vilius Dranseika & Marcin Waligora - 2018 - Public Health Ethics 11 (2):213-220.
Factors influencing the effectiveness of research ethics committees.C. A. Schuppli & D. Fraser - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (5):294-301.
Contextualising Merit and Integrity within Human Research.Ian Pieper & Colin J. H. Thomason - 2011 - Monash Bioethics Review 29 (4):39-48.
Ethical expertise and Human Research Ethics Committees.Peter Douglas - 2012 - Monash Bioethics Review 30 (2):81-101.
Artificial intelligence and medical research databases: ethical review by data access committees.Nina Hallowell, Darren Treanor, Daljeet Bansal, Graham Prestwich, Bethany J. Williams & Francis McKay - 2023 - BMC Medical Ethics 24 (1):1-7.
Qualitative health research and procedural ethics: An interview study to investigate researchers’ ways of navigating the demands of medical research ethics committees in Germany.Sarah Potthoff, Fee Roth & Matthé Scholten - 2024 - Research Ethics 20 (2):388-410.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-03

Downloads
10 (#1,479,591)

6 months
4 (#1,272,377)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references