Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?

Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (2):78-85 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mandatory vaccination, including for COVID-19, can be ethically justified if the threat to public health is grave, the confidence in safety and effectiveness is high, the expected utility of mandatory vaccination is greater than the alternatives, and the penalties or costs for non-compliance are proportionate. I describe an algorithm for justified mandatory vaccination. Penalties or costs could include withholding of benefits, imposition of fines, provision of community service or loss of freedoms. I argue that under conditions of risk or perceived risk of a novel vaccination, a system of payment for risk in vaccination may be superior. I defend a payment model against various objections, including that it constitutes coercion and undermines solidarity. I argue that payment can be in cash or in kind, and opportunity for altruistic vaccinations can be preserved by offering people who have been vaccinated the opportunity to donate any cash payment back to the health service.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A libertarian case for mandatory vaccination.Jason Brennan - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics Recent Issues 44 (1):37-43.
How Mandatory Can We Make Vaccination?Ben Saunders - 2022 - Public Health Ethics 15 (3):220-232.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-07

Downloads
172 (#141,257)

6 months
11 (#246,005)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?