Autonomy, Interests, Justice and Active Medical Euthanasia

In Jukka Varelius & Michael Cholbi, New Directions in the Ethics of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 31-48 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are 4 main arguments for euthanasia: (1) arguments appealing to consistency (e.g., from passive to active euthanasia); (2) the argument from respect for autonomy; (3) appeals to justice; and (4) the argument from interests (mercy or relief of suffering). I will argue that only the last is directly relevant to active euthanasia as a medical intervention, though arguments together from autonomy and justice can in practice (through the backdoor) provide a ground for voluntary active medical euthanasia (AME).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,824

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-20

Downloads
40 (#633,151)

6 months
13 (#266,907)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Julian Savulescu
Oxford University

Citations of this work

African vital force and the permissibility of euthanasia.Kirk Lougheed - 2025 - Journal of Medical Ethics 51 (4):233-238.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references