Why majority rule cannot be based only on procedural equality

Ratio Juris 23 (1):113-122 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-02-23

Downloads
104 (#204,110)

6 months
9 (#488,506)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ben Saunders
University of Southampton

Citations of this work

Fairness between competing claims.Ben Saunders - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (1):41-55.
The modal argument improved.Brian Cutter - 2020 - Analysis 80 (4):629-639.
Inequality and majority rule.Justin P. Bruner - 2020 - Analysis 80 (4):617-629.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Should the numbers count?John Taurek - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):293-316.

View all 26 references / Add more references