The foundations of attitudes about animal research

Ethics and Behavior 16 (2):117 – 133 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Much controversy has surrounded the use of animals in research. Empirically, much of the research has focused on how ethical individuals believe animal research to be, but it has not systematically examined the specific beliefs or reasons why individuals do or do not believe animal research to be ethical. Study 1 investigated the thematic foundations for the decision that animal research is or is not ethical by examining the content of essays written by participants explaining why they do or do not support the use of animals in research. Results indicated that individuals who believed animal research was ethical most often referenced beliefs that animal research furthered human well-being, provided mechanisms to cure disease, and was well-regulated. Individuals who believed animal research was not ethical most often referenced beliefs that animal research was inhumane, unnecessary, and nonconsensual. Study 2 used the themes to create a scale to assess animal research attitudes.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why IACUCs Need Ethicists.Nathan Nobis - 2019 - ILAR Journal 60 (3):324–333.
Animal ethics in animal research.Helena Röcklinsberg - 2017 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Mickey Gjerris & Anna Olsson.
Standards for animal research: Looking at the middle.Rebecca Dresser - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):123-143.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
82 (#255,485)

6 months
7 (#706,906)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?