Bradley’s Supposed Rejection of Subject-Predicate Judgements

Bradley Studies 4 (1):102-112 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I agree that Wollheim is wrong in his reconstruction of Bradley's arguments on Subject-Predicate judgements, but not completely. Wollheim is right about the conclusion of Bradley's arguments. I argue that Bradley does not reject subject-predicate form of judgements rather he attack's the idea that there is some judgement in which the subject is the nude reality.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wollheim on Bradley on Subjects and Predicates.James W. Allard - 1986 - Idealistic Studies 16 (1):27-40.
Time, Relations and Dependence.Leemon B. McHenry - 1983 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 21 (3):405-419.
Predication and Ontology.Karel Lambert - 1987 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):603 - 614.
Bradley, James, and Whitehead on Relations.Leemon B. Mchenry - 1989 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 3 (3):149 - 169.
Bradley's Theory of Judgement.M. J. Cresswell - 1979 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (4):575 - 594.
Bradley's Conception of Metaphysics.Leemon McHenry - 1996 - In W. J. Mander (ed.), Perspectives on the Logic and Metaphysics of F. H. Bradley. Bristol, England: Burns & Oates. pp. 159-175.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
408 (#70,686)

6 months
102 (#59,598)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references