Albert Einstein in 1935 on Electrosmog and Fake News

Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 29 (3):93-94 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The biological impact of electromagnetic radiation on humans and other living beings still is controversial and inconclusive. In 1935 Albert Einstein called such an impact ‘fake news’, probably using the prestige of the Nobel Price as a powerful placebo. How should he and we deal with issues of electrosmog, placebo effects, and fake news today?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Effects of Electrosmog on Birds: An Overview.J. Thresa Jeniffer, J. Joannes Sam Mertens & A. Joseph Thatheyus - 2016 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 26 (6):216-218.
Pragmatist Media Ethics and the Challenges of Fake News.Scott R. Stroud - 2019 - Journal of Media Ethics 34 (4):178-192.
The Fake News about Fake News.David Coady - 2021 - In Sven Bernecker, Amy K. Flowerree & Thomas Grundmann (eds.), The Epistemology of Fake News. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
What is fake news?M. R. X. Dentith - 2018 - University of Bucharest Review 8 (2):24-34.
What is fake news?Romy Jaster & David Lanius - 2018 - Versus 2 (127):207-227.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-07

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hans-Martin Sass
Ruhr-Universität Bochum

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references