William J. Devlin and Alisa Bokulich: Kuhn’s structure of scientific revolutions: 50 years on [Book Review]

Metascience 25 (1):65-70 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is an essay review of W. J. Devlin and A. Bokulich (eds.) Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions 50 years on

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Půlstoletí kontroverzí o Kuhnově Struktuře. [REVIEW]Petr Jedlička - 2016 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 38 (2):250-260.
Kuhn and the Historiography of Science.Alexander Bird - 2015 - In William J. Devlin & Alisa Bokulich (eds.), Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On. Cham: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 311. Springer.
Kuhn’s Structure: A Moment in Modern Naturalism.Steven Shapin - 2015 - In William J. Devlin & Alisa Bokulich (eds.), Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On. Cham: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 311. Springer.
Introduction.Alisa Bokulich & William J. Devlin - 2015 - In William J. Devlin & Alisa Bokulich (eds.), Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On. Cham: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 311. Springer.
Kuhn’s Development Before and After Structure.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2015 - In William J. Devlin & Alisa Bokulich (eds.), Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On. Cham: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 311. Springer.
The Evolving Notion and Role of Kuhn’s Incommensurability Thesis.James A. Marcum - 2015 - In William J. Devlin & Alisa Bokulich (eds.), Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions - 50 Years On. Cham: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 311. Springer.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-18

Downloads
348 (#81,675)

6 months
94 (#65,633)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Howard Sankey
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations