Natural Language and the Paradox of the Liar

Semiotica 5 (4) (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/semi.1972.5.4.305

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Geoffrey Sampson: Liberty and Language.Harry M. Bracken - 1981 - Dialogue 20 (4):771-783.
On Sommers’ Concept of Natural Syntax.Asa Kasher - 1971 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 20:139-143.
Two Fallacies in Proofs of the Liar Paradox.Peter Eldridge-Smith - 2020 - Philosophia 48 (3):947-966.
Liar-Like Paradoxes and Metalanguage Features.Klaus Ladstaetter - 2013 - Southwest Philosophy Review 29 (1):61-70.
Analysing the Concept of.Reena Cheruvalath - 2020 - Cultura 17 (1):87-98.
Understanding the liar.Douglas Patterson - 2007 - In J. C. Beall (ed.), The Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 197.
"Making Sense" by Geoffrey Sampson. [REVIEW]Barbara Abbott - 1980 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4:437.
The Liar Without Relativism.Poppy Mankowitz - 2021 - Erkenntnis 88 (1):267-288.
The Liar Paradox.James Werner Scow - 1991 - Dissertation, Columbia University
Truth & Transcendence: Turning the Tables on the Liar Paradox.Gila Sher - 2017 - In Bradley P. Armour-Garb (ed.), Reflections on the Liar. Oxford, England: Oxford University. pp. 281-306.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-17

Downloads
18 (#1,118,624)

6 months
7 (#724,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

An empirical hypothesis about natural semantics.Geoffrey Sampson - 1976 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (2):209 - 236.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references