Dialogue or Mutual Accusations?

Russian Studies in Philosophy 29 (3):62-68 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dialogue is the form proper to the new thinking. To resolve the global problems of the modern world and perestroika, we should have a thorough understanding of history, of all the participants in historical processes , and of ourselves. But our stereotypes are different: he who is not with us is against us; our mistakes are accidental, but the mistakes of those who think differently are inevitable. What kind of dialogue and mutual understanding is this? What we have is a didactic and debunking monologue, a bellicose self-defense, and an aggressive accusation. Find the guilty party!

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,253

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-27

Downloads
25 (#921,682)

6 months
3 (#1,061,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references