Callicles Refuted

In Socrates, pleasure, and value. New York: Oxford University Press (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is of the highest importance to Plato to refute Callicles’ hedonist thesis, and for the purposes of such a refutation, he gives two arguments, which I call the argument from opposites and the argument from pleased cowards. I give a new interpretation of these arguments and show that both arguments are defensible.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,253

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Question of Temperance and Hedonism in Callicles.Kristian Urstad - 2011 - Leeds International Classical Studies.
Socrates, pleasure, and value.George Rudebusch - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Das Menschenbild des Kallikles im platonischen Gorgias.Holger Gutschmidt - 2017 - Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 20 (1):1-17.
Saving Callicles in the Gorgias – An Argument from Plato’s Later Dialogues -.Jong-Hwan Lee - 2022 - Journal of the New Korean Philosophical Association 110:119-132.
Dialectic in Plato's "Phaedo".Miriam Newton Byrd - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Georgia
Faith and the Existence of God.R. G. Swinburne - 1988 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 24:121-143.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
9 (#1,560,696)

6 months
3 (#1,061,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

George Hilding Rudebusch
Northern Arizona University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references