Why ‘art’ doesn't have two senses

British Journal of Aesthetics 31 (3):214-221 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,733

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Functional Definitions Of Art: A Response to Rowe.Graham Oppy - 1993 - British Journal of Aesthetics 33 (1):67-71.
Hume's principles of taste: A reply to Dickie.James Shelley - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):84-89.
"The Art Circle": A Theory of Art": George Dickie. [REVIEW]Graham Mcfee - 1986 - British Journal of Aesthetics 26 (1):72.
Ethics and aesthetics: Replies to Dickie, Stecker, and Livingston.Noël Carroll - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (1):82-95.
Weitz reconsidered: A clearer view of why theories of art fail.Richard Kamber - 1998 - British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (1):33-46.
Aesthetic experience and the revelation of value.Jeffrey Petts - 2000 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 58 (1):61-71.
Classification and evaluation in aesthetics: Weitz and Aristotle.Richard Peltz - 1971 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 30 (1):69-78.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
110 (#192,869)

6 months
9 (#461,774)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Dual Character Art Concepts.Shen-yi Liao, Aaron Meskin & Joshua Knobe - 2020 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 101 (1):102-128.
The Definition of 'Game'.M. W. Rowe - 1992 - Philosophy 67 (262):467 - 479.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references