No dilemma for pancritical rationalism: In response to Hauptli

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (3):490-494 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hauptli (1991) presents a putative dilemma for Bartley’s (1984) pancritical rationalism that has remained unchallenged. This note sets the record straight by exposing two lacunae in Hauptli’s argument

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-06-24

Downloads
169 (#139,475)

6 months
9 (#485,111)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Darrell P. Rowbottom
Lingnan University

Citations of this work

Rationalism Critical and Pancritical: What Did Popper and Bartley Disagree About?Dmytro Sepetyi - 2024 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 14 (2):572-602.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Critical Rationalism. A Restatement and Defence.David Miller - 1995 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 185 (3):368-371.
A dilemma for Bartley's pancritical rationalism.Bruce W. Hauptli - 1991 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (1):86-89.

Add more references